Showing posts with label sockpuppets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sockpuppets. Show all posts

Sunday, March 8, 2015

Pseudonym Sunday: The Rise and Fall of MsScribe

Fewer pseudonyms live on in infamy than that of the notorious MsScribe. The story is a saga that literally spans years. It has become a bizarre piece of internet lore, a drama-filled story that entertains as much as it repulses. An absurd comedy that has become the stuff of legends. It is probably the definitive piece of fandom wank, the likes of which we might never see again. Users can and have written thousands of word about the events and their fallout. The most famous and comprehensive of these write-ups is so long that it’s even segmented into chapters. Charolette Lenox’s work is admittedly a super long but very entertaining read if you have the time. It is perhaps the most referenced work, almost a required reading, when people discuss MsScribe.

I’m not going to try and summarize everything. Others already have done a much better job than I could hope to replicate. One blogger, Scott Alexander, succinctly summarizes:

In the early 2000s, Harry Potter fanfiction authors and readers get embroiled in an apocalyptic feud between people who think that Harry should be in a relationship with Ginny vs. people who think Harry should be in a relationship with Hermione. This devolves from debate to personal attacks to real world stalking and harassment to legal cases to them splitting the community into different sites that pretty much refuse to talk to each other and ban stories with their nonpreferred relationship.
These sites then sort themselves out into a status hierarchy with a few people called Big Name Fans at the top and everyone else competing to get their attention and affection, whether by praising them slavishly or by striking out in particularly cruel ways at people in the “enemy” relationship community.
A young woman named MsScribe joins the Harry/Hermione community. She proceeds to make herself popular and famous by use of sock-puppet accounts (a sockpuppet is when someone uses multiple internet nicknames to pretend to be multiple different people) that all praise her and talk about how great she is. Then she moves on to racist and sexist sockpuppet accounts who launch lots of slurs at her, so that everyone feels very sorry for her.
At the height of her power, she controls a small army of religious trolls who go around talking about the sinfulness of Harry Potter fanfiction authors and especially MsScribe and how much they hate gay people. All of these trolls drop hints about how they are supported by the Harry/Ginny community, and MsScribe leads the campaign to paint everyone who wants Harry and Ginny to be in a relationship as vile bigots and/or Christians. She classily cements her position by convincing everyone to call them “cockroaches” and post pictures of cockroaches whenever they make comments.
Throughout all this, a bunch of people are coming up with ironclad evidence that she is the one behind all of this (this is the Internet! They can just trace IPs!) Throughout all of it, MsScribe makes increasingly implausible denials. And throughout all of it, everyone supports MsScribe and ridicules her accusers. Because really, do you want to be on the side of a confirmed popular person, or a bunch of confirmed suspected racists whom we know are racist because they deny racism which is exactly what we would expect racists to do?
MsScribe writes negatively about a fan with cancer asking for money, and her comments get interpreted as being needlessly cruel to a cancer patient. Her popularity drops and everyone takes a second look at the evidence and realizes hey, she was obviously manipulating everyone all along. There is slight sheepishness but few apologies, because hey, we honestly thought the people we were bullying were unpopular.

(I stress that this is a very abridged version that glosses over and skips A LOT.)

If it has not been made apparent yet, this tale starts over a decade ago in the early 2000s. It was the time when livejournal acted as the central hub for fandom activity. Everyone was recovering from the 90s, Myspace was still starting up, and many internet users still had to go through dial-up connection instead of broadband. (For anyone who doesn’t know what I’m talking about, be glad you were never subjected to this awful noise.) Even so, the MsScribe story may still provide some sections that echo more modern activity and may still have some relevance for people.

At its core, the MsScribe story is one of a user who was determined to reach fame (BNFdom) by any means possible. She constructed wild stories for her pseudonym, generally just caused a lot of drama, and used a variety of sockpuppets, both to prop her up and slash her down. Of course, the latter only further endeared her to her followers. In the process, she stepped on more than a few toes. It’s easy to forget that MsScribe’s dramatic show involved other real people, people who were personally invested, deceived, and hurt. She caused a lot of chaos and backlashing in the circles she frequented. And as she moved up in popularity, the ripples only grew.

In the fallout, many users began to look critically at the structure of online fandom and fame.

MsScribe's heyday is over, but her legacy still lives on. It provides the perfect study for a lot of behaviors that are prevalent on the internet today - the drive for internet fame, sockpuppeting, stirring up drama. It speaks to the dangers of imagined hierarchies and internet communities who all too easily believe almost anything with minimal information. It exposes how easily some social structures on the web may be exploited and manipulated.  People still refer to her usernames and even claim them as their own at times. Some people have even role played as the users involved.

And above all, it makes a really entertaining read.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Pseudonym Sunday: Why Pseudonyms?

Two days ago, I explored why fans might choose to go anonymous in their interactions with fandom at large – mainly for the sake of privacy and all the freedoms that it entails.

  

Today, however, I will be looking at the close cousin to anonymity - the pseudonym - which I will be returning to weekly. I find the two forms of online personas to be pretty similar in that they both relinquish and distance themselves from a person’s true identity. Anonymity is just taken to one extreme of that spectrum. Pseudonyms are a bit more moderate by giving a definitive username. True, a pseudonym somewhat constrains the freedom afforded to a user by giving them a traceable identity. But, they are also given a completely blank slate, a new beginning. The user can start from scratch and mold their identity in any way they see fit. Gender, race, age, job, nationality – they all become insignificant. The user can literally be anyone.

why pseudonyms 1Full post here.

Like anonymity, pseudonyms can be very liberating. This sort of control over identity can open up a fan to a variety of paths and behaviors. A pseudonym, for example, creates enough separation between fan activity and real life while still allowing the fan to claim certain works or comments as their own. They are identifiable only by an assumed persona. And the best part is that you can shuck off that facade at any time for any reason. For some people, this freedom alone is sufficient for their needs. It gives them a decisive divide between fannish and real life activities, or even separation between different fandoms.

Others like to play around with their options a bit more. It’s not uncommon for people to make roleplaying accounts. In such cases the username and profile are all modeled after a character from some media and the account’s behavior tends to follow that role. It’s a bit of harmless fun for the most part. A few users, however, choose to exploit pseudonyms. When drama gets stirred up in a fandom, some fans create new, separate accounts to to use as tools for deception. This is done in order to make it appear as if other users are rallying for or against the original, even though all of the users are really one person. This sort of behavior is known by many as sockpuppeting and is generally frowned upon. There are some very infamous tales of online sockpuppets, but that will be another story for another week.